+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 6.2% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 offers 131.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Both models have similar pricing. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
1 month newer
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50($0.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:76.3%(+6.2%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:70.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:76.3%(+6.2%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:70.1%
Providers:1