+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5V vs Kimi K2 Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct offers 65.5K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5V. Both models have similar pricing. GLM-4.5V supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V was developed as a vision-language variant, designed to understand and reason about both images and text in Chinese and English. Built to extend Zhipu AI's multilingual capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual understanding alongside bilingual language processing.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
1 month newer
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
GLM-4.5V
Zhipu AI
2025-08-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.20($0.07 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1