+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5V vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct offers 59.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5V. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $2.05 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V was developed as a vision-language variant, designed to understand and reason about both images and text in Chinese and English. Built to extend Zhipu AI's multilingual capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual understanding alongside bilingual language processing.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
10 months newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
GLM-4.5V
Zhipu AI
2025-08-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.20
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40($2.05 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:5