+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5V vs Mistral Small
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5V offers 131.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small. Mistral Small is $2.00 cheaper per million tokens. GLM-4.5V supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V was developed as a vision-language variant, designed to understand and reason about both images and text in Chinese and English. Built to extend Zhipu AI's multilingual capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual understanding alongside bilingual language processing.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small was created as an efficient model offering, designed to provide capable language understanding with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve cost-sensitive applications while maintaining quality, it enables Mistral's technology in scenarios where resource efficiency is valued.
10 months newer
Mistral Small
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
GLM-4.5V
Zhipu AI
2025-08-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.20
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.60($2.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1