+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5V vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5V offers 60.4K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Pixtral-12B is $2.50 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V was developed as a vision-language variant, designed to understand and reason about both images and text in Chinese and English. Built to extend Zhipu AI's multilingual capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual understanding alongside bilingual language processing.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
10 months newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
GLM-4.5V
Zhipu AI
2025-08-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.20
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($2.50 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1