+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5V vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct offers 59.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5V. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is $2.62 cheaper per million tokens. GLM-4.5V supports multimodal inputs. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V was developed as a vision-language variant, designed to understand and reason about both images and text in Chinese and English. Built to extend Zhipu AI's multilingual capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual understanding alongside bilingual language processing.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
10 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
GLM-4.5V
Zhipu AI
2025-08-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.20
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.09($2.62 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:4