+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs Grok Code Fast 1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok Code Fast 1 leads with 2.8% higher average benchmark score. Grok Code Fast 1 offers 69.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.6. Grok Code Fast 1 is $0.90 cheaper per million tokens. GLM-4.6 supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok Code Fast was developed as a specialized coding model optimized for speed, designed to provide rapid code completion, generation, and assistance. Built to serve developers requiring quick feedback and iterative coding support, it combines programming expertise with low-latency responses.
1 month newer
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.00
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Input:$0.20
Output:$1.50($0.90 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:68.0%
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Average Score:70.8%(+2.8%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Coding68.0%
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Coding70.8%(+2.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Avg Score:70.8%(+2.8%)
Providers:1