+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 16.1% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.6 supports multimodal inputs. GLM-4.6 is available on 2 providers. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct-0905 represents a specific release iteration of the K2 Instruct model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements. Built to provide enhanced instruction-following based on deployment feedback, it continues the evolution of Moonshot's instruction-tuned offerings.
25 days newer
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:60.1%(+16.1%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:44.0%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Coding68.0%(+2.2%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Coding65.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:60.1%(+16.1%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:44.0%
Providers:0