+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 24.9% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.6 supports multimodal inputs. GLM-4.6 is available on 2 providers. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B was created through NVIDIA's optimization of Llama 3.3, designed to provide a balanced option with 49 billion parameters. Built to serve as a versatile mid-to-large-scale offering, it combines NVIDIA's customization expertise with Meta's foundation architecture.
6 months newer
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:87.5%(+24.9%)
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:62.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:87.5%(+24.9%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:62.5%
Providers:0