+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 19.6% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.6 is available on 2 providers. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium was introduced as a specialized model for advanced reasoning and analytical tasks, designed to handle complex problem-solving scenarios. Built to serve enterprise and professional applications requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Mistral's focus on high-quality analytical capabilities.
3 months newer
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:87.5%(+19.6%)
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:67.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:87.5%(+19.6%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:67.8%
Providers:0