+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral NeMo Instruct offers 59.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.6. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $2.30 cheaper per million tokens. GLM-4.6 supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
1 year newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($2.30 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2