+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 36.8% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.6 is available on 2 providers. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct represents a further evolution of the Small model series, developed with continued refinements to instruction-following and task performance. Built to incorporate ongoing improvements, it provides the latest capabilities in Mistral's intermediate-scale offering.
3 months newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:81.0%(+36.8%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:44.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:81.0%(+36.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:44.2%
Providers:0