+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs o1-preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 17.2% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.6 offers 35.8K more tokens in context window than o1-preview. GLM-4.6 is $72.40 cheaper per million tokens. GLM-4.6 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-preview was introduced as an early version of OpenAI's reasoning model series, designed to demonstrate the potential of AI models that engage in extended thinking before responding. Built to solve complex problems through deliberate reasoning processes, it represented an initial step toward more thoughtful and analytical AI systems.
1 year newer
o1-preview
OpenAI
2024-09-12
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.00($72.40 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:74.5%(+17.2%)
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Average Score:57.3%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Coding68.0%(+26.7%)
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Coding41.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:74.5%(+17.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Avg Score:57.3%
Providers:2