+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs o3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 42.3% higher average benchmark score. o3 offers 103.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.6. GLM-4.6 is $7.40 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 is a multimodal language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (93.9%), LiveCodeBench v6 (82.8%), GPQA (81.0%). It supports a 197K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.5% across 22 benchmarks. It excels particularly in COLLIE (98.4%), AIME 2024 (91.6%), ARC-AGI (88.0%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.00($7.40 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o3
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:17.1%
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:59.4%(+42.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o3
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:17.1%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:59.4%(+42.3%)
Providers:1