+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 offers 60.4K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Pixtral-12B is $2.30 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
1 year newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.00
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($2.30 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1