+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 35.5% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.6 supports multimodal inputs. GLM-4.6 is available on 2 providers. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
1 year newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:81.0%(+35.5%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:45.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:81.0%(+35.5%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:45.5%
Providers:0