+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 8.0% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.6 offers 65.5K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $0.95 cheaper per million tokens. GLM-4.6 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
20 days newer
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50($0.95 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:85.9%(+8.0%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:77.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:85.9%(+8.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:77.9%
Providers:1