+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Granite 3.3 8B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo leads with 6.1% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs. GPT-3.5 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-3.5 Turbo is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base was developed by IBM as an enterprise-focused foundation model, designed to provide a reliable starting point for business applications. Built with 8 billion parameters and trained on curated data, it serves as a foundation for domain-specific customization in enterprise contexts.
2 years newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:69.3%(+6.1%)
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Average Score:63.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Granite 3.3 8B Base
2024-04-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 90 tok/s
Latency: 0.8ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:69.3%(+6.1%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Avg Score:63.3%
Providers:0