+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct leads with 2.2% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. GPT-3.5 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the Granite base model, designed to follow instructions reliably in enterprise settings. Built to serve business applications requiring dependable language understanding, it provides IBM's accessible interface for enterprise AI.
2 years newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:69.3%
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Average Score:71.5%(+2.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
2024-04-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 90 tok/s
Latency: 0.8ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:69.3%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Avg Score:71.5%(+2.2%)
Providers:0