+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Kimi-k1.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi-k1.5 leads with 28.4% higher average benchmark score. Kimi-k1.5 supports multimodal inputs. GPT-3.5 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, Kimi-k1.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. Notable strengths include DROP (70.2%), MMLU (69.8%), HumanEval (68.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.7% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), CLUEWSC (91.4%), C-Eval (88.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:24.2%
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:52.5%(+28.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 90 tok/s
Latency: 0.8ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:24.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:52.5%(+28.4%)
Providers:0