+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Kimi K2 0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 34.5% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 503.8K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. GPT-3.5 Turbo is $1.10 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
2 years newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50($1.10 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:52.9%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:87.4%(+34.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 90 tok/s
Latency: 0.8ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:52.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:87.4%(+34.5%)
Providers:2