+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Medium leads with 40.0% higher average benchmark score. Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs. GPT-3.5 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, Magistral Medium is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium was introduced as a specialized model for advanced reasoning and analytical tasks, designed to handle complex problem-solving scenarios. Built to serve enterprise and professional applications requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Mistral's focus on high-quality analytical capabilities.
2 years newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:30.8%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:70.8%(+40.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 90 tok/s
Latency: 0.8ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:30.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:70.8%(+40.0%)
Providers:0