+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 51.1% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 279.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. GPT-3.5 Turbo is $73.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. Notable strengths include DROP (70.2%), MMLU (69.8%), HumanEval (68.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50($73.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:16.9%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:68.0%(+51.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 90 tok/s
Latency: 0.8ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:16.9%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:68.0%(+51.1%)
Providers:2