+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct leads with 18.4% higher average benchmark score. Phi-3.5-vision-instruct supports multimodal inputs. GPT-3.5 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. Notable strengths include DROP (70.2%), MMLU (69.8%), HumanEval (68.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.3% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ScienceQA (91.3%), POPE (86.1%), MMBench (81.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:22.5%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:41.0%(+18.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 90 tok/s
Latency: 0.8ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:22.5%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:41.0%(+18.4%)
Providers:0