+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 34.7% higher average benchmark score. Phi 4 offers 11.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. Phi 4 is $1.79 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Phi 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. Notable strengths include DROP (70.2%), MMLU (69.8%), HumanEval (68.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.0% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (84.8%), HumanEval+ (82.8%), HumanEval (82.6%). The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14($1.79 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:22.5%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:57.2%(+34.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 90 tok/s
Latency: 0.8ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:22.5%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:57.2%(+34.7%)
Providers:1