+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 27.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT-3.5 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. Notable strengths include DROP (70.2%), MMLU (69.8%), HumanEval (68.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.7%), HumanEval+ (92.9%), IFEval (83.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 years newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:18.8%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:45.9%(+27.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 90 tok/s
Latency: 0.8ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:18.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:45.9%(+27.1%)
Providers:0