+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Pixtral Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Pixtral Large offers 235.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. GPT-3.5 Turbo is $6.00 cheaper per million tokens. Pixtral Large supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large was developed as a larger-scale multimodal model, designed to provide advanced vision-language understanding capabilities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated analysis of visual and textual information, it represents Mistral's flagship offering for multimodal applications.
1 year newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Pixtral Large
Mistral AI
2024-11-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50($6.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:0.0%
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Average Score:66.7%(+66.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 90 tok/s
Latency: 0.8ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Avg Score:66.7%(+66.7%)
Providers:1