+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 leads with 22.8% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs. GPT-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.7% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) (96.3%), HellaSwag (95.3%), Uniform Bar Exam (90.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (90.6%), IFEval (83.9%), AIME 2024 (79.5%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:51.8%(+22.8%)
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:29.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:51.8%(+22.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:29.0%
Providers:0