+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 Turbo vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 Turbo leads with 15.0% higher average benchmark score. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. GPT-4 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4 Turbo is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the Granite base model, designed to follow instructions reliably in enterprise settings. Built to serve business applications requiring dependable language understanding, it provides IBM's accessible interface for enterprise AI.
1 year newer
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Average Score:86.5%(+15.0%)
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Average Score:71.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
2024-04-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 97 tok/s
Latency: 0.6ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Avg Score:86.5%(+15.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Avg Score:71.5%
Providers:0