+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 Turbo vs Grok-2 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Grok-2 mini supports multimodal inputs. GPT-4 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 Mini was created as a more efficient variant of Grok 2, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make Grok 2's advancements accessible to applications with tighter resource constraints, it balances performance with practical deployment needs.
4 months newer
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Average Score:73.6%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:74.0%(+0.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 97 tok/s
Latency: 0.6ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Avg Score:73.6%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:74.0%(+0.4%)
Providers:0