+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 Turbo vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 Turbo leads with 6.3% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4 Turbo is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B was developed by NVIDIA through customization of Meta's Llama 3.1 70B, designed to enhance performance for specific use cases and deployments. Built with NVIDIA's optimizations and fine-tuning expertise, it demonstrates how foundation models can be adapted for specialized applications.
5 months newer
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Average Score:86.5%(+6.3%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:80.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 97 tok/s
Latency: 0.6ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Avg Score:86.5%(+6.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:80.2%
Providers:0