+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 Turbo vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads with 6.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
11 months newer
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Average Score:48.0%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:54.1%(+6.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 97 tok/s
Latency: 0.6ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Avg Score:48.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:54.1%(+6.1%)
Providers:0