+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 Turbo vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 Turbo leads with 18.5% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct offers 123.9K more tokens in context window than GPT-4 Turbo. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $39.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4 Turbo is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
3 months newer
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Input:$10.00
Output:$30.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($39.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Average Score:86.5%(+18.5%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:68.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 97 tok/s
Latency: 0.6ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Avg Score:86.5%(+18.5%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2