+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 Turbo vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 17.8% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
1 year newer
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Average Score:48.0%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:65.8%(+17.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 97 tok/s
Latency: 0.6ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Avg Score:48.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:65.8%(+17.8%)
Providers:0