+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 Turbo vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 Turbo leads with 14.5% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4 Turbo is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B was created as an efficient coding-specialized model, designed to bring strong programming capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built with 7 billion parameters optimized for code understanding and generation, it provides developers with a lightweight option for code-related tasks.
5 months newer
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Average Score:82.1%(+14.5%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Average Score:67.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 97 tok/s
Latency: 0.6ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Avg Score:82.1%(+14.5%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Avg Score:67.5%
Providers:0