Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 3.9% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct offers 190.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-4. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $89.60 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
1 year newer

GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Cost per million tokens (USD)

GPT-4

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

GPT-4

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
GPT-4
2022-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

GPT-4
Azure
OpenAI


GPT-4

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

GPT-4

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together