+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 leads with 6.3% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs. GPT-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B was developed by NVIDIA through customization of Meta's Llama 3.1 70B, designed to enhance performance for specific use cases and deployments. Built with NVIDIA's optimizations and fine-tuning expertise, it demonstrates how foundation models can be adapted for specialized applications.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:89.7%(+6.3%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:83.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:89.7%(+6.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:83.4%
Providers:0