+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 leads with 12.3% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct offers 190.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-4. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $89.97 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Input:$30.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input:$0.01
Output:$0.02($89.97 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:66.8%(+12.3%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Average Score:54.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:66.8%(+12.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Avg Score:54.4%
Providers:1