+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 9.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.9M more tokens in context window than GPT-4. Llama 4 Scout is $89.62 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Input:$30.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($89.62 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:59.6%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:69.4%(+9.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:59.6%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:69.4%(+9.8%)
Providers:6