+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 leads with 13.6% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct offers 190.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-4. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $89.70 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Input:$30.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($89.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:89.7%(+13.6%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:76.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:89.7%(+13.6%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:76.1%
Providers:2