+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 leads with 2.0% higher average benchmark score. Pixtral-12B offers 70.7K more tokens in context window than GPT-4. Pixtral-12B is $89.70 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Input:$30.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($89.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:65.1%(+2.0%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:63.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:65.1%(+2.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:63.1%
Providers:1