+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads with 9.6% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs. GPT-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 32B was created as a larger variant in the Qwen 2.5 family, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities with 32 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring stronger reasoning and generation quality, it represents a powerful option for demanding language understanding tasks.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:69.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:78.6%(+9.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:69.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:78.6%(+9.6%)
Providers:0