+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads with 16.7% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:57.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:74.5%(+16.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:57.8%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:74.5%(+16.7%)
Providers:0