Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 41.5% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking offers 65.5K more tokens in context window than GPT-4. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $88.35 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
2 years newer

GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

GPT-4

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

GPT-4

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
GPT-4
2022-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

GPT-4
Azure
OpenAI


GPT-4

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

GPT-4

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita