+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
QwQ-32B leads with 29.5% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs. GPT-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, QwQ-32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ 32B was developed as a reasoning-focused model, designed to emphasize analytical thinking and problem-solving capabilities. Built with 32 billion parameters optimized for step-by-step reasoning, it demonstrates Qwen's exploration into models that prioritize deliberate analytical processing.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:35.7%
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:65.2%(+29.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:35.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:65.2%(+29.5%)
Providers:0