+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4 vs QwQ-32B-Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
QwQ-32B-Preview leads with 29.5% higher average benchmark score. QwQ-32B-Preview is $89.65 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs. QwQ-32B-Preview is available on 4 providers. Overall, QwQ-32B-Preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ 32B Preview was introduced as an early access version of the QwQ reasoning model, designed to allow researchers and developers to experiment with advanced analytical capabilities. Built to gather feedback on reasoning-enhanced architecture, it represents an experimental step toward more thoughtful language models.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
QwQ-32B-Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-11-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Input:$30.00
Output:$60.00
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.20($89.65 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:35.7%
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B-Preview
Average Score:65.2%(+29.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
QwQ-32B-Preview
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:35.7%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B-Preview
Avg Score:65.2%(+29.5%)
Providers:4