+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 leads with 37.2% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 30 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.2%), CharXiv-D (87.9%), IFEval (87.4%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 days newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 33 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Average Score:51.6%(+37.2%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:14.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
GPT-4.1
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 10ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Avg Score:51.6%(+37.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:14.4%
Providers:0