+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 mini vs Grok-4 Heavy
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 Heavy leads with 43.4% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, Grok-4 Heavy is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4.1, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve applications where speed and cost are priorities while maintaining solid performance, it extends the GPT-4.1 capabilities to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 Heavy was created as a larger, more capable variant of Grok 4, designed to provide maximum reasoning depth and analytical capability. Built for the most demanding applications requiring sophisticated problem-solving, it represents xAI's flagship offering in the fourth generation.
2 months newer
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Average Score:36.3%
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:79.7%(+43.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 mini
2024-05-31
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
2 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 5ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Avg Score:36.3%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:79.7%(+43.4%)
Providers:0