+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 mini vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 mini leads with 5.3% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 18.9M more tokens in context window than GPT-4.1 mini. Llama 4 Scout is $1.62 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4.1, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve applications where speed and cost are priorities while maintaining solid performance, it extends the GPT-4.1 capabilities to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
9 days newer
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($1.62 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Average Score:74.6%(+5.3%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:69.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 mini
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
2 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 5ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Avg Score:74.6%(+5.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:69.2%
Providers:6