+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 mini vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 mini leads with 10.9% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 mini offers 1.0M more tokens in context window than Phi 4. Phi 4 is $1.79 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4.1 mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4.1, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve applications where speed and cost are priorities while maintaining solid performance, it extends the GPT-4.1 capabilities to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
4 months newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14($1.79 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Average Score:78.9%(+10.9%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:68.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 mini
2024-05-31
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
2 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 5ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Avg Score:78.9%(+10.9%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:1